Equivalences
Tags: #◇Problem Solving #◇Equivalences #◇CCDSTRU #◇Logic #◇M1
◇Important Formulas
Logical Equivalence Rules
Compound propositions whose truth values are the same for all possible cases are said to be logically equivalent (p≡q or p⇔q).
Identity Laws: p∧T≡p p∨F≡p
Domination Laws: p∧F≡F p∨T≡T
Negation Laws: p∧¬p≡F p∨¬p≡T
Idempotent Laws: p∧p≡p p∨p≡p
Involution Law: ¬(¬p)≡p
De Morgan's Laws: ¬(p∧q)≡¬p∨¬q ¬(p∨q)≡¬p∧¬q
Commutative Laws: p∧q≡q∧p p∨q≡q∨p
Associative Laws: p∧(q∧r)≡(p∧q)∧r p∨(q∨r)≡(p∨q)∨r
Distributive Laws: p∧(q∨r)≡(p∧q)∨(p∧r) p∨(q∧r)≡(p∨q)∧(p∨r)
Absorption Laws: p∧(p∨q)≡p p∨(p∧q)≡p
Material Implication Laws: p→q≡¬p∨q
Material Equivalence Laws: p↔q≡(p→q)∧(q→p) p↔q≡(p∧q)∨(¬p∧¬q)
◇Worked Examples
Definitions of Truth Value Types Tautology (Fact): A compound proposition whose truth value is always true. Contradiction (Fallacy): A compound proposition whose truth value is always false. Contingency: A compound proposition whose truth value is not a tautology nor a contradiction.
[!tip] Verification
You can verify equivalence pairs (e.g., p→q and ¬q→¬p) using Rules of Logical Equivalences or by constructing truth tables and verifying that their outputs match for all possible truth assignments of their variables.
◇References & Navigation